Mads Greaker

• Greaker, Mads & Popp, David (2023). Environmental economics, regulation and innovation. I Braunerhjelm, Pontus; Andersson, Martin; Blind, Knut & Eklund, Johan (Red.), Handbook of Innovation and Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 978 1 80088 446 5.
• Golombek, Rolf; Greaker, Mads; Kverndokk, Snorre & Ma, Lin (2023). Policies to Promote Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies. Environmental and Resource Economics. ISSN 0924-6460. 85(1), s. 267–302. doi: 10.1007/s10640-023-00767-5. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine & Proost, Stef (2022). An economic model of vehicle-to-grid: Impacts on the electricity market and consumer cost of electric vehicles. Resource and Energy Economics. ISSN 0928-7655. 69. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101310. Vis sammendrag

  Higher battery storage capacity in electric vehicles (EV) implies less need for inconvenient recharging during long trips and increases the potential gains from vehicle-to-grid (V2G) electricity supply. We present an analytical model for the intertwinement of the consumers’ choice of battery capacity and the electricity market. We show that V2G increases the consumers’ choice of battery capacity, and it may reduce the cost of owning an EV vis-à-vis a traditional car. Furthermore, V2G alleviates the capacity pressure on peak hours, and thereby reduces the need for investment in generating capacity, saving social costs. Moreover, V2G may make the difference in electricity prices between peak and off-peak hours smaller, potentially increasing social surplus further. Based on a future scenario for the Belgian electricity market, we provide a numerical illustration indicating that the savings might be substantial.

• Aune, Finn Roar; Gaure, Simen; Golombek, Rolf; Greaker, Mads; Kittelsen, Sverre & Ma, Lin (2022). Promoting CCS in Europe: A case for green strategic trade policy? Energy Journal. ISSN 0195-6574. 43(6), s. 71–102. doi: 10.5547/01956574.43.6.faun. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  According to IEA (2018), there is a huge gap between the first-best social optimal utilization of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies to lower global CO2 emissions and the current, negligible diffusion of this technology. This calls for a financial support mechanism for CCS. We study to what extent promotion of CCS in Europe should be through subsidizing development and production of CCS technologies—an upstream subsidy—or by subsidising the purchasers of CCS technologies—a downstream subsidy. This question is examined theoretically in a stylized model and numerically by using a new approach that integrates strategic trade policy with an economic model of the European energy markets. The theory model suggests that upstream subsidies should clearly be preferred, and this is confirmed by the numerical simulations. For the European power market, the numerical simulations suggest that subsidies to CCS coal power should exceed subsidies to CCS gas power.

• Greaker, Mads (2021). Optimal regulatory policies for charging of electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. ISSN 1361-9209. 97, s. 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102922.
• Golombek, Rolf; Greaker, Mads & Hoel, Michael (2020). Should environmental R&D be prioritized? . Resource and Energy Economics. ISSN 0928-7655. 60. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.101132. Vis sammendrag

  An innovator may not be able to capture the full social benefit of her innovation and, therefore, governments support private R&D through various measures. We compare a market good innovation—to develop a more efficient technology to produce a standard market good—with an environmental innovation—to develop a more efficient abatement technology—that has the same potential to increase the social surplus. In the first-best outcome, which can be achieved by offering an R&D subsidy and a diffusion subsidy, the R&D subsidy should be greatest for an environmental innovation, whereas the diffusion subsidy should be greatest for a market good innovation. The ranking of the two types of subsidies reflects that the appropriability problem is greater for an environmental innovation than for a market good innovation.

• Greaker, Mads & Hagem, Cathrine (2020). Elbiler og toveislading - Fordeler for både bileiere og strømkunder. Samfunnsøkonomen. ISSN 1890-5250. s. 31–39. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Greaker, Mads; Vormedal, Irja & Rosendal, G. Kristin (2020). Environmental policy and innovation in Norwegian fish farming: Resolving the sea lice problem? Marine Policy. ISSN 0308-597X. 117. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103942. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Golombek, Rolf; Greaker, Mads & Kverndokk, Snorre (2019). Hva er framtiden for CCS? Samfunnsøkonomen. ISSN 1890-5250. s. 54–65.
• Greaker, Mads; Golombek, Rolf & Hoel, Michael (2019). Global Impact of National Climate Policy in the Nordic Countries. Nordic Economic Policy Review. ISSN 1904-4526. s. 157–202. doi: 10.6027/Nord2019-012.
• Asheim, Geir Bjarne; Fæhn, Taran; Nyborg, Karine; Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine & Harstad, Bård Gjul [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2019). The case for a supply-side climate treaty. Science. ISSN 0036-8075. 365(6451), s. 325–327. doi: 10.1126/science.aax5011. Vis sammendrag

  During decades of international climate policy negotiations, aiming to limit demand for fossil fuels, the stock of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased considerably, and even the flow of emissions to the atmosphere continues to grow (1). To reach the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping global warming well below 2°C, substantial parts of the world's fossil fuels simply cannot be combusted and must be left in the ground (1, 2). Recent work thus suggests redirecting climate policies toward fossil fuel producers directly (3–5) by capping the flows of extraction and restricting the stocks of resources available for exploration. We synthesize key economic mechanisms that support this approach, arguing that an international treaty among fossil fuel–producing countries could (i) enhance the impact of the Paris Agreement in the presence of free riders; (ii) stimulate investment in low-carbon technology research and development (R&D); (iii) provide insurance against a failed Paris Agreement; and (iv) make carbon policies more acceptable to fossil fuel producers, thus increasing their support. None of these effects depend on universal producer participation. Moreover, such a treaty need not be costly and could in fact help reduce the costs of the required transition to a low-carbon economy.

• Fæhn, Taran; Asheim, Geir Bjarne; Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine; Harstad, Bård Gjul & hoel, michael [Vis alle 10 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2018). Parisavtalen og oljeeksporten. Samfunnsøkonomen. ISSN 1890-5250. 3, s. 39–50. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Fischer, Carolyn; Greaker, Mads & Rosendahl, Knut Einar (2018). Strategic technology policy as a supplement to renewable energy standards. Resource and Energy Economics. ISSN 0928-7655. 51, s. 84–98. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.05.006. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Greaker, Mads & Kristoffersen, Mats (2017). Lading av elbiler: Bør vi godta flere standarder? Samfunnsøkonomen. ISSN 1890-5250. 131(4), s. 67–77. Vis sammendrag

  Organiseringen av lading av elbiler kan ha mye å si for hvor vellykket overgangen til elbiler blir. Det finnes allerede flere ulike ladestandarder. Bilprodusenten Tesla har valgt å lage sin egen standard, og nå følger kanskje de tyske bilgigantene etter. Men er det ønskelig? For bensin og diesel tar man det for gitt at det er samme standard, og alle biltyper kan tanke på alle fyllestasjoner. Ulike standarder fører til at hver enkelt elbileier har tilgang til færre mulige ladestasjoner. Dette kan igjen påvirke utbredelsen av elbiler negativt. Videre kan de samfunnsøkonomiske kostnadene av å kutte klimagassutslipp bli unødvendig høye.

• Greaker, Mads; Grimsrud, Kristine & Lindholt, Lars (2017). The potential resource rent from Norwegian fisheries. Marine Policy. ISSN 0308-597X. 84, s. 156–166. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.014. Vis sammendrag

  National wealth can be estimated via the System of National Accounts (SNA). According to SNA-numbers, Norwegian fisheries contributed negatively to the national wealth in the period 1984–2016 with exception of the years 2010–2011 and 2015–2016. Because all parameter values entering the calculation of national wealth are conditional on the existing management regime, the potential value of the natural resources may be concealed. This paper finds that this is the case for the Norwegian fishery sector. Using a numerical optimization model, the paper estimates the contra factual resource rent to be 1.6 billion USD if the fishing quotas were harvested efficiently with the currently available technology. This is 1.2 billion USD more than the observed resource rent in 2011 and means that Norwegian fisheries contribute to national wealth four times more than indicated by 2011 SNA-numbers. Hence, national wealth calculations based on official statistics may trivialize the role of natural resources.

• Andersen, Jørgen Juel & Greaker, Mads (2017). Emission Trading with Fiscal Externalities: The Case for a Common Carbon Tax for the Non-ETS Emissions in the EU. Environmental and Resource Economics. ISSN 0924-6460. 71(3), s. 803–823. doi: 10.1007/s10640-017-0184-x. Vis sammendrag

  A government is fiscally constrained if it is unable to raise sufficient tax revenue to finance the first-best level of public spending. When involved in emission trading, a fiscally constrained government will potentially seek to close its fiscal gap through emission permit sales. This fiscal incentive therefore generates a fiscal externality in the permit market that is endogenous to the extent of fiscal constrainedness among the participating countries. Our theory explains how, and when, fiscal externalities may be expected to arise. Moreover, we show that in a permit market equilibrium with fiscal externalities, the initial allocation of emission permits between countries will affect: (1) the price of emission permits, (2) the global distribution of abatement effort, and (3) total greenhouse gas mitigation costs. This is contrary to the textbook model of emission permit markets. Our findings are especially relevant for the EU which is about to allow for trading in emission rights between EU member countries for all emissions outside the European Emissions Trading System..

• Greaker, Mads; Heggedal, Tom-Reiel & Rosendahl, Knut Einar (2017). Environmental Policy and the Direction of Technical Change. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. ISSN 0347-0520. 120(4), s. 1100–1138. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12254. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Should governments direct R&D from "dirty" into "clean" technologies? How im-portant is this compared to carbon pricing? We inquire into this, introducing twonovelties compared to recent literature. We introduce decreasing returns to R&D, andallow future carbon taxes to in‡uence current R&D decisions. Our results suggest thatgovernments should prioritize clean R&D. Dealing with major environmental problemsrequires R&D to shift to clean technology. However, with most researchers workingwith clean technology, both productivity spillovers and future risks of being replacedincrease. Consequently, the wedge between private and social value of an innovation islargest for clean technologies.

• Fischer, Carolyn; Greaker, Mads & Rosendahl, Knut Einar (2017). Robust technology policy against emission leakage: The case of upstream subsidies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ISSN 0095-0696. 84, s. 44–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.02.001. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Greaker, Mads & Midttømme, Kristoffer (2016). Network effects and environmental externalities: Do clean technologies suffer from excess inertia? Journal of Public Economics. ISSN 0047-2727. 143, s. 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.004.
• Fischer, Carolyn; Greaker, Mads & Rosendahl, Knut Einar (2016). Are Renewable Energy Subsidies in Need of Reform? I Strand, Jon (Red.), The Economics and Political Economy of Energy Subsidies. MIT Press. ISSN 9780262034647. s. 255–272.
• Greaker, Mads & Rosnes, Orvika (2015). Robuste norske klimamålsetninger : . Samfunnsøkonomen. ISSN 1890-5250. 129(1), s. 67–77.
• Eggert, Håkan; Greaker, Mads & Kidane, Asmerom (2015). Trade and resources: Welfare effects of the Lake Victoria fisheries boom. Fisheries Research. ISSN 0165-7836. 167, s. 156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.02.015.
• Eggert, Hakan & Greaker, Mads (2014). Promoting second generation biofuels: Does the first generation pave the road? Energies. ISSN 1996-1073. 7(7), s. 4430–4445. doi: 10.3390/en7074430.
• Greaker, Mads; Hoel, Michael Olaf & Rosendahl, Knut Einar (2014). Does a renewable fuel standard for biofuel reduce climate costs? Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. ISSN 2333-5955. 1(3), s. 337–363. doi: 10.1086/678189. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Alfsen, Knut H.; Moe, Thorvald & Greaker, Mads (2013). Sustaining Welfare for Future Generations: A Review Note on the Capital Approach to the Measurement of Sustainable Development. Challenges in Sustainability. ISSN 2297-6477. 1(1), s. 16–26. doi: 10.12924/cis2013.01010016.
• Greaker, Mads & Hagem, Cathrine (2013). Strategic Investment in Climate Friendly Technologies: The Impact of Global Emissions Trading. Environmental and Resource Economics. ISSN 0924-6460. doi: 10.1007/s10640-013-9718-z.
• Hovi, Jon; Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine & Holtsmark, Bjart (2012). A credible compliance enforcement system for the climate regime. Climate Policy. ISSN 1469-3062. 12(6), s. 741–754. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2012.692206. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The compliance enforcement system of the Kyoto Protocol provides only weak incentives for Parties to comply with their commitments. For example, the penalties for non-compliant countries are not legally binding, and moreover, there is no second-order punishment for those countries that fail to implement them. Thus, a Party can simply refuse to comply without consequence. The alternative compliance enforcement systems that have been proposed in the literature also face substantial problems. A simple, flexible, potent, and credible compliance enforcement system for a post-Kyoto climate agreement, based on deposits, is proposed here: at ratification, each country deposits a significant amount of money, and continues to do so in the preparation stage each year until the start of the commitment period. At the end of this period, those countries that meet their emissions limitation targets receive a full refund of their deposit, while those that fail to do so forfeit part or all of it. A simplified two-country model of the deposit system and a numerical example of an agreement involving the US, Japan, Russia, and Europe is also provided. If each country’s deposit is no less than its abatement costs, there is a strong incentive for participating countries to avoid noncompliance.

• Hoel, Michael Olaf & Greaker, Mads (2011). Incentives for Environmental R&D. CESifo Working Papers. ISSN 1617-9595.
• Golombek, Rolf; Greaker, Mads; Kittelsen, Sverre A.C.; Røgeberg, Ole Jørgen & Aune, Finn Roar (2011). Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in the European Power Market. Energy Journal. ISSN 0195-6574. 32(3), s. 209–237. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-No3-8. Vis sammendrag

  We examine the potential of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies in the European electricity markets, assessing whether CCS technologies will reduce carbon emissions substantially in the absence of investment subsidies, and how the availability of CCS technologies may affect electricity prices and the amount of renewable electricity. To this end we augment a multi-market equilibrium model of the European energy markets with CCS electricity technologies. The CCS technologies are characterized by costs and technical efficiencies synthesized from a number of recent CCS reviews. Our simulations indicate that with realistic values for carbon prices, new CCS coal power plants become profitable, totally replacing non-CCS coal power investments and to a large extent replacing new wind power. New CCS gas power also becomes profitable, but does not replace non-CCS gas power investment fully. Substantially lower costs, through subsidies on technological development or deployment, would be necessary to make CCS modification of existing coal and gas power plants profitable for private investors.

• Golombek, Rolf; Greaker, Mads & Hoel, Michael Olaf (2010). Carbon Taxes and Innovation without Commitment. The B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy. ISSN 1555-0494. 10(1). doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.2473.
• Hoel, Michael Olaf & Greaker, Mads (2009). Entreprenörskap och innovationer för hållbar utveckling: Kap 2. I Braunerhjelm, Pontus (Red.), Entreprenörskap och innovationer för hållbar utveckling. Entreprenörskapsforum. ISSN 91-89301-31-5. s. 27–44.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Søgaard, Gunnhild; Øistad, Knut; Sevillano, Ignacio & Greaker, Mads (2023). Hvilken rolle kan norskprodusert biodrivstoff spille i oppnåelsen av norske klimamål i 2030?
• Lindholt, Lars & Greaker, Mads (2022). The Resource Rent in Norwegian Aquaculture from 1984 to 2020 – Is the Rent Ripe for Taxation? Social Science Research Network (SSRN). ISSN 1556-5068. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4018251. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This study uses the National Accounts and the definitions of the UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting to calculate the resource rents in Norwegian aquaculture in the period 1984-2020. If we know the remuneration of all input factors such as capital, labour, and inter-mediates except the remuneration of the ecosystem services used in aquaculture, the resource rent will appear as the difference between the value of output and the remuneration of all other input factors. This resource rent is a combination of a Ricardian rent and regulation rent. To as-sess the size of the rent, we perform various sensitivity analysis as introducing higher rates of return, applying alternative wage costs and by treating the stock of growing fish as real capital. A robust conclusion is that there has been a significant resource rent in aquaculture since 2000 and that it has risen markedly since 2012. In the period 2016-2020 it has averaged 18-20 billion NOK per year. Hence, both from an allocative justice and economic efficiency perspective, the Norwegian aquaculture industry seems ripe for resource rent taxation.

• Asheim, Geir B.; Fæhn, Taran; Golombek, Rolf; Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine & Harstad, Bård [Vis alle 12 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2021). Norsk olje-politikk kan bidra for klimaet. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116. s. 28–29.
• Greaker, Mads & Lindholt, Lars (2021). The resource rent in Norwegian aquaculture 1984-2020: Calculations applying the National Accounts. Discussion papers. ISSN 1892-753X. Vis sammendrag

  Inntekter fra naturressurser er knyttet til begrepet ressursrente eller grunnrente. Ressursrenten er den inntekten fra å utnytte en naturressurs som blir igjen etter at alle nødvendige innsatsfaktorer har fått sin markedsmessige avlønning. Grunnrenten er altså merinntekten av å disponere en naturressurs, eller med andre ord; det man tjener utover det man normalt ville ha tjent ved å investere realkapital og humankapital i andre virksomheter. Det er bare et begrenset antall steder (lokaliteter) i Norge og hele verden som er egnet for havbruk, og dette gir opphav til ressursrente. Gode lokaliteter avhenger blant annet av klimatiske forhold, kvalitet på sjøvann og beskyttelse mot vær og vind. I likhet med andre naturressursnæringer kan begrenset adgang også betraktes som et resultat av samspillet mellom ressursknapphet og regulering av næringen i form av et begrenset antall produksjonstillatelser.

• Greaker, Mads; Hoel, Michael; Lund, Diderik; Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Wulfsberg, Fredrik (2021). Også usikre tall må diskonteres. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Greaker, Mads; Hoel, Michael; Lund, Diderik; Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Wulfsberg, Fredrik (2021). Nåverdi selvsagt ikke bare pedagogikk. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Greaker, Mads & Kvalnes, Pål Arne (2020). Nå kan du selge strømmen i elbilen din. [Internett]. oslomet.no.
• Asheim, Geir Bjarne; Fæhn, Taran; Nyborg, Karine; Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine & Harstad, Bård Gjul [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2020). Arguments for a new supply-side climate treaty. EAERE Magazine.
• Asheim, Geir Bjarne; Fæhn, Taran; Nyborg, Karine; Greaker, Mads; Harstad, Bård Gjul & Hagem, Cathrine [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2020). Strengthening the Paris Agreement by supply-side climate policies. Atlas of Science.
• Lindholt, Lars & Greaker, Mads (2019). Oppdretterne har betalt syv milliarder for noe som er verd 200 milliarder. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Lindholt, Lars & Greaker, Mads (2019). Oppdretternes «superprofitt» på nivå med vannkraftens. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine & Proost, Stef (2019). Vehicle-to-Grid: Impacts on the electricity market and consumer cost of electric vehicles. Discussion papers. ISSN 1892-753X. Vis sammendrag

  Higher battery storage capacity in electric vehicles (EV) can potentially serve two purposes: First, the larger the capacity, the less need for inconvenient recharging during long trips. Second, the larger the capacity, the larger the potential gains from vehicle-to-grid (V2G) electricity supply during peak prices or during periods of imbalance. We present an analytical model for the intertwinement of the consumers’ choice of battery capacity and the potential for supplying power to the electricity market. We show that V2G increases the consumers’ choice of battery capacity, and it may reduce the cost of owning an EV vis-à-vis a traditional car. Furthermore, V2G alleviates the capacity pressure on peak hours, and thereby reduces the need for investment in backup power, saving social costs. Based on a future scenario for the Belgian electricity market, we provide a numerical illustration indicating that the savings may be substantial.

• Asheim, Geir Bjarne; Fæhn, Taran; Nyborg, Karine; Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine & Harstad, Bård Gjul [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2019). En ny, internasjonal klimaavtale bør på plass. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Hjort, Ingrid Cathrine & Greaker, Mads (2019). Green R&D Clubs.
• Andreassen, Gøril Louise; Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Greaker, Mads (2018). Støtt klimaløsninger i stedet for petroleumsforskning. Stavanger Aftenblad. ISSN 0804-8991.
• Barton, David Nicholas; Grimsrud, Kristine; Heyman, Axel; Greaker, Mads; Chen, Xianwen & Garnåsjordet, Per Arild [Vis alle 7 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2017). Monetary valuation methods in urban ecosystem accounting -examples of their relevance for municipal policy and planning in the Oslo metropolitan area .
• Midttømme, Kristoffer & Greaker, Mads (2014). Environmental Policies and Network Effects.
• Andersen, Jørgen Juel & Greaker, Mads (2013). Insufficient Fiscal Capacity may ruin the Efficiency properties of GHG Cap and Trade.
• Bye, Brita & Greaker, Mads (2009). Biodiesel og drivstoffavgifter. Dagsavisen. ISSN 1503-2892.
• Bruvoll, Annegrete; Greaker, Mads; Bye, Brita; Fæhn, Taran & Hagem, Cathrine (2009). Kvotekutt ikke løsningen. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Bruvoll, Annegrete & Greaker, Mads (2009). Kvotekutt ikke løsningen. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Greaker, Mads & Hagem, Cathrine (2008). Det globale klimatet: Vad kan et litet land som Norge Bidra med? Ekonomisk Debatt. ISSN 0345-2646. s. 44–45.
• Greaker, Mads & Hagem, Cathrine (2007). Det globale klima: Noen tanker om hvordan Norge kan bidra. RØST: Radikalt økonominettverks skriftserie. ISSN 1503-9595. s. 10–19.
• Fredriksen, Halvard Haukeland; Arve, Malin; Breiland, Marianne; Gjønnes, Arnhild Dordi; Greaker, Mads & Gresseth, Jon Reidar [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2024). NOU 2024: 9 Ny lov om offentlige anskaffelser — Andre delutredning. Departementenes sikkerhets- og serviceorganisasjon. ISSN 0333-2306. 2024(9).
• Dalen, Hanne Marit; Greaker, Mads & Hagem, Cathrine (2023). Ressursrenten i naturressursnæringene i Norge 1984-2022: med eget kapittel om vindkraft. Statistisk sentralbyrå. ISSN 978-82-587-1813-7.
• Fredriksen, Halvard Haukeland; Arve, Malin; Breiland, Marianne; Gjønnes, Arnhild Dordi; Greaker, Mads & Gresseth, Jon Reidar [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). NOU 2023: 26 Ny lov om offentlige anskaffelser - første delutredning. Departementenes sikkerhets- og serviceorganisasjon. ISSN 978-82-583-1583-1.
• Greaker, Mads; Hagem, Cathrine & Skulstad, Andreas (2022). Internalizing negative environmental impacts from wind power production: Coasian bargaining, offsetting schemes and environmental taxes. Statistisk sentralbyrå. ISSN 1892-753X.
• Greaker, Mads & Lindholt, Lars (2022). Ressursrenten i naturressursnæringene i Norge 1984-2021. Statistisk sentralbyrå,. ISSN 978-82-587-1542-6. Vis sammendrag

  Norge er et land rikt på naturressurser. Ekstraordinær høy avkastning i en kommersiell sektor som baserer seg på en naturressurs omtales som grunnrente eller ressursrente. Denne rapporten bruker nasjonalregnskapstall fra Statistisk sentralbyrå for å undersøke om det har vært ressursrente i de naturressursbaserte næringene i perioden fra 1984 til 2021. Disse næringene omfatter kraftproduksjon, akvakultur, skogbruk, fiske og fangst, jordbruk, bergverk og olje- og gassutvinning. Holder vi jordbruket utenom ligger samlet gjennomsnittlig ressursrente for de fem siste årene i perioden 1984-2021 nesten 260 milliarder 2021-kroner over gjennomsnittet for de fem første årene. Holder vi også olje- og gassektoren utenom ligger samlet årlig ressursrente over 60 milliarder kroner høyere mot slutten i forhold til i begynnelsen av perioden. Det er særlig kraftproduksjon, akvakultur og fiske og fangst som har bidratt til denne økningen.

• Hjort, Ingrid; Harstad, Bård Gjul & Greaker, Mads (2020). Second-Best Approaches to Regulate Emissions. UiO. ISSN 1504-3991.
• Greaker, Mads & Lindholt, Lars (2019). Grunnrenten i norsk akvakultur og kraftproduksjon fra 1984 til 2018. Statistisk sentralbyrå. ISSN 0806-2056. Vis sammendrag

  Ekstraordinær høy avkastning i en kommersiell sektor som baserer seg på en naturressurs omtales som grunnrente. Denne rapporten bruker nasjonalregnskapstall fra Statistisk sentralbyrå for å undersøke om det har vært grunnrente i akvakultur og kraftproduksjon i perioden fra 1984 til 2018. En robust konklusjon er at det har vært en betydelig grunnrente i disse sektorene siden år 2000.

• Andersen, Jørgen Juel & Greaker, Mads (2014). The Fiscal Incentive of GHG Cap and Trade: Permits May Be Too Cheap and Developed Countries May Abate Too Little. Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP).
• Hoel, Michael Olaf; Greaker, Mads & Rasmussen, Ingeborg (2009). Climate policy – costs and design. TemaNord. ISSN 0908-6692.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin