Adams, N. P., et al. (2019). "Legitimacy beyond the state: institutional purposes and contextual constraints." Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23(3): 281-291.
Ajevski, M. (2014). "Fragmentation in international human rights law - beyond conflict of laws." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32(2): 87-98.
Ajevski, M. (2014). "Freedom of speech as related to journalists in the ECtHR, IACtHR and the human rights committee: a study of fragmentation." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32(2): 118-139.
Ajevski, M. (2013). "International Criminal Law and Constitutionalisation: on Hegemonic Narratives in Progress." Erasmus Law Review 6(1): 50-61.
Álvarez Zárate, J. M., et al. (2020). "Duration of investor-state dispute settlement proceedings." Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2-3): 300-335.
Andresen, S. E. (2016). "The Role of International Courts and Tribunals in Global Environmental Governance." Air & Space Power Journal 7(3): 67-81.
Arato, J., et al. (2023). "The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform Process: Design, Dilemmas and Discontents." Journal of International Dispute Settlement 14(2): 127-133.
Baetens, F. (2023). "Beyond State Consent to International Jurisdiction – From Courts to Law’." The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 22(3): 459-520.
Baetens, F. (2023). "World Trade Organization Rules before Investment Tribunals: Facilitating Cross-Fertilisation while Appreciating Particularities." Journal of World Investment & Trade 24: 1-36.
Baetens, F. (2022). Agents of cross-fertilisation: abusive forum shopping or legitimate forum choice? Beyond Fragmentation: Cross-Fertilisation, Cooperation and Competition among International Courts and Tribunals, Cambridge University Press.
Baetens, F. (2022). "Protecting foreign investment and public health through arbitral balancing and treaty design." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 21(1): 139-182.
Baetens, F. (2022). "Transparency across International Courts and Tribunals: Enhancing Legitimacy or Disrupting the Adjudicative Process?" Nordic Journal of International Law 91: 595-636.
Baetens, F. (2020). Identity and diversity on the international bench: implications for the legitimacy of international adjudication. Identity and Diversity on the International Bench: Who is the Judge?, Oxford University Press: 592.
Baetens, F. (2019). First to rise and first to fall: the Court of Cartago (1907-1918). Experiments in International Adjudication: Historical Accounts, Cambridge University Press: 372.
Baetens, F. (2019). Invoking human rights: A useful line of attack or a defence tool for States in investor-State dispute settlement? Human Rights Norms in ‘Other' International Courts, Cambridge University Press: 227-262.
Baetens, F. (2019). Unseen actors in international courts and tribunals: challenging the legitimacy of international adjudication. Legitimacy of Unseen Actors in International Adjudication, Cambridge University Press: 496.
Baetens, F. (2018). "No Deal is Better Than a Bad Deal? The Fallacy of the WTO Fall-Back Option as a post-Brexit Safety Net." Common market law review 55(2/3): 133-174.
Baetens, F. (2017). "Attention à la marche! L'importance des dispositions transitoires pour les traités d'investissement bilatéraux conclus entre les États membres de l'UE et les États tiers." Cahiers de Droit Europeen 3: 611-647.
Baetens, F. (2017). The Iron Rhine Case: On the right track to sustainable development? Sustainable Development Principles in the Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals: 1992-2012, Routledge: 297-315.
Baetens, F. (2017). Pacta Sunt Servanda. Elgar Encyclopedia of International Economic Law, Edward Elgar Publishing: 283-285.
Baetens, F. (2017). State Responsibility. Elgar Encyclopedia of International Economic Law, Edward Elgar Publishing: 285-289.
Baetens, F. and J. Crawford (2023). Assistance from an unexpected corner? International trade law’s contribution to combatting pandemics. The EU and the WTO: Ever the Twain Shall Meet – Liber Amicorum Marco Bronckers, Kluwer Law International: 400.
Baetens, F. and J. Crawford (2022). The influence of international trade law on international law. Oxford Handbook on International Trade Law, Oxford University Press: 160-191.
Baetens, F., et al. (2023). Functions of the International Court of Justice. Cambridge Companion on the International Court of Justice, Cambridge University Press: 800.
Baetens, F. and T. Kluwen (2018). International Court of Justice. The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy, Wiley-Blackwell: 2168.
Baetens, F. and V. Lavista (2021). Where is your tribunal? Bernard Loder (1849-1935) and the quest for international justice. The League of Nations and the Development of International Law: A New Intellectual History of the Advisory Committee of Jurists, Routledge: 195-217.
Bailliet, C. M. (2016). "A Nordic Approach to Promoting Women's Rights within International Law: Internal v. External Perspectives." Nordic Journal of International Law 85(4): 368-394.
Bailliet, C. M. (2013). "Measuring compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: the ongoing challenge of judicial independence in Latin America." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 31(4): 477-495.
Behn, D., et al. (2022). The International Investment Regime and Its Discontents. The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press: 39-82.
Behn, D., et al. (2022). Introduction: The Legitimacy Crisis and the Empirical Turn. The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press: 1-38.
Behn, D., et al. (2020). "Empirical Perspectives on Investment Arbitration: What Do We Know? Does It Matter?" Journal of World Investment & Trade 21: 188-250.
Behn, D., et al. (2021). Evidence-Guided Reform: Surveying the Empirical Research on Arbitrator Bias and Diversity in Investor-State Arbitration. International Economic Dispute Settlement: Demise or Transformation?, Cambridge University Press: 264-294.
Behn, D. F. (2015). "Legitimacy, Evolution and Growth in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Empirically Evaluating the State-of-the-Art." Georgetown Journal of International Law 46(2): 363.
Behn, D. F. and O. K. Fauchald (2015). "Governments under cross-fire? Renewable energy and international economic tribunals." Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 12(2): 117-139.
Behn, D. F., et al. (2017). "Promoting renewable energy in the EU: Shifting trends in Member state policy space." European Business Law Review 28(2): 217-243.
Berge, T. G. and A. Berger (2021). "Do Investor-State Dispute Settlement Cases Influence Domestic Environmental Regulation? The Role of Respondent State Bureaucratic Capacity." Journal of International Dispute Settlement 12: 1-41.
Berge, T. G. and O. K. Fauchald (2023). "International Organizations, Technical Assistance, and Domestic Investment Laws." World Trade Review 22(1): 147-172.
Berge, T. G. and Ø. Stiansen (2022). "Bureaucratic capacity and preference attainment in international economic negotiations." The Review of International Organizations: 32.
Berge, T. L. (2020). "Dispute by Design? Legalization, Backlash, and the Drafting of Investment Agreements." International Studies Quarterly 64(4): 919-928.
Berge, T. L. and T. St. John (2020). "Asymmetric diffusion: World Bank ‘best practice’ and the spread of arbitration in national investment laws." Review of International Political Economy 28(3): 584-610.
Brandon, E. H. (2019). "Grave breaches and justifications: The war crime of forcible transfer or deportation of civilians and the exception for evacuations for imperative military reasons." Oslo Law Review 6(2): 107-124.
Brekke, S. A., et al. (2023). "The CJEU Database Platform: Decisions and Decision-Makers." Journal of Law and Courts 11(2): 389-410.
Brekke, S. A., et al. (2022). "That's an Order! How the Quest for Efficiency Is Transforming Judicial Cooperation in Europe." Journal of Common Market Studies 61(1): 58-75.
Brinkmann, M. and J. V. Wibye (2023). "Towards Non-essentialism – Tracking Rival Views of Legitimacy as a Right to Rule." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 43(3): 497-519.
Chavez, L. C. (2013). "The Claude-Reyes Case of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights – Strengthening Chilean Democracy?" Nordic Journal of Human Rights 31(4): 513-531.
Chavez, L. C. and A. Føllesdal (2013). "Fragile Democracies, Strong Human Rights Courts? Comparing European and Inter-American Cases." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 31(4): 471-476.
Chiou, F.-Y., et al. (2019). "Delegation of committee reports in the European Parliament." European Union Politics 21(2): 233-254.
Cornejo Chavez, L., et al. (2019). "The Presidential Pardon of Fujimori: Political Struggles in Peru and the Subsidiary Role of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights." International Journal of Transitional Justice 13(2): 328-348.
Corradetti, C. (2016). "Introduction - Symposium - Cosmopolitan Law and the Courts." Transnational Legal Theory 7(1): 20-28.
Corradetti, C. (2016). "Judicial Cosmopolitan Authority." Transnational Legal Theory 7(1): 29-56.
Corradetti, C. (2016). "Kant's Legacy and the Idea of a Transitional Jus Cosmopoliticum." Ratio Juris 29(1): 105-121.
Corradetti, C. (2015). "The Priority of Conflict Deterrence and the Role of the International Criminal Court in Kenya’s Post-Electoral Violence 2007–2008 and 2013." Human Rights Review 16(3): 257-272.
Corradetti, C. (2015). Transitional Times, Reflective Judgment and the Hōs Mē Condition. Theorizing Transitional Justice, Ashgate: 277.
Crawford, J. and F. Baetens (2022). "The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: More than a “Plank in a Shipwreck”?" ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal 37(1-2): 13-19.
Derlén, M., et al. (2019). "You’re Gonna Miss Me When I’m Gone! The Impact of Brexit on Member States’ Contribution to the Case Law of the CJEU." Europarättslig tidskrift.
Fauchald, O. K. (2022). Domstolenes rolle i miljørelaterte saker. Våre perifere domstoler, Fagbokforlaget: 37-63.
Fauchald, O. K. (2021). "Peacebuilding Functions of International Environmental Governance." Environmental Policy and Law 51(1-2): 91-95.
Fauchald, O. K. (2020). "International investment law in support of the right to development?" Leiden Journal of International Law 34(1): 181-201.
Fauchald, O. K. (2016). Property and Environmental Protection in Investor – State Arbitration. Environmental and Property Protection in Europe. A Comparative Overview, Europa Law Publishing: 359.
Fauchald, O. K., et al. (2022). Explaining China’s Relative Absence from Investment Treaty Arbitration. The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press: 424-464.
Follesdal, A. (2021). "In defense of deference: International human rights as standards of review." Journal of Social Philosophy 54(4): 526-547.
Føllesdal, A. (2022). The Significance of State Consent for the Legitimate Authority of Customary International Law. The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law, Cambridge University Press: 105-136.
Føllesdal, A. (2021). How International Courts can Help Secure Global Public Goods Worth Having: Pure Public Goods and Beyond. Protecting Community Interests through International Law, Intersentia: 31-59.
Føllesdal, A. (2021). "How many women judges are enough on international courts?" Journal of Social Philosophy: 1-23.
Føllesdal, A. (2021). "International human rights courts and the (international) rule of law: Part of the solution, part of the problem, or both?" Global Constitutionalism 10(1): 118-138.
Føllesdal, A. (2021). "A just yet unequal European Union: a defense of moderate economic inequality." Review of social economy 81(1): 8-36.
Føllesdal, A. (2020). "Add international courts to The Idea of Human Rights and stir … on Beitz’ The Idea of Human Rights after 10 years." Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25(1): 66-86.
Føllesdal, A. (2020). Religion and the State: the ‘Lautsi’ Case of the European Court of Human Rights About Crucifixes in Italian Class Rooms. State and Religion: Between Conflict and Cooperation, Nomos: 597.
Føllesdal, A. (2020). "Survey Article: The Legitimacy of International Courts." Journal of Political Philosophy 28(4): 476-499.
Føllesdal, A. (2019). A Better Signpost, Not a Better Walking Stick: How to Evaluate the European Consensus Doctrine. Building Consensus on European Consensus. Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights in Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: 488.
Føllesdal, A. (2019). Legitimacy Criticisms of International Courts: Not only Fuzzy Rhetoric? Legitimacy. The State and Beyond, Oxford University Press: 272.
Føllesdal, A. (2018). Appreciating the Margin of Appreciation. Human Rights: Moral or Political?, Oxford University Press: 528.
Føllesdal, A. (2018). Constitutionalization, Not Democratization. Legitimacy and International Courts, Cambridge University Press: 388.
Føllesdal, A. (2018). "The European Research Council @ 10: Whither hopes and fears?" European Political Science 18(2): 237-247.
Føllesdal, A. (2018). The Legitimate Authority of International Courts and Its Limits: A Challenge to Raz's Service Conception? Legal authority beyond the state, Cambridge University Press: 500.
Føllesdal, A. (2018). "More than meets the eye – and less: Comments on The Internationalists." Global Constitutionalism 7(3): 330-341.
Føllesdal, A. (2018). Power or Authority; Actions or Beliefs. International Court Authority, Oxford University Press: 464.
Føllesdal, A. (2017). "Exporting the margin of appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights." International Journal of Constitutional Law 15(2): 359-371.
Føllesdal, A. (2017). "Independent yet Accountable: Stress Test Lessons for the European Court of Human Rights." Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 24(4): 484-510.
Føllesdal, A. (2017). Law making by law breaking? A theory of parliamentary civil disobedience against international human rights courts. The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: 329-352.
Føllesdal, A. (2017). Theories of Human Rights: Political or Orthodox - Why it Matters. Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press: 77-96.
Føllesdal, A. (2017). "Tracking Justice Democratically." Social Epistemology 31(3): 324-339.
Føllesdal, A. (2016). "Building democracy at the Bar: the European Court of Human Rights as an agent of transitional cosmopolitanism." Transnational Legal Theory 7(1): 95-113.
Føllesdal, A. (2016). "Implications of contested multilateralism for global constitutionalism." Global Constitutionalism 5(3): 297-308.
Føllesdal, A. (2016). Squaring the circle at the battle at Brighton: is the war between protecting human rights or respecting sovereignty over, or has it just begun? Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection. Routledge: 205.
Føllesdal, A. (2016). "Subsidiarity and International Human-Rights Courts: Respecting Self-Governance and Protecting Human Rights — Or Neither?" Law & Contemporary Problems 79(2): 147-163.
Føllesdal, A. (2015). Democracy, Identity, and European Public Spheres. European Public Spheres: Politics is Back, Cambridge University Press: 247-262.
Føllesdal, A. (2015). Democratic Standards in an Asymmetric Union. Democratic Politics in a European Union under stress, Oxford University Press: 199-216.
Føllesdal, A. (2015). John Rawls' Theory of Justice as Fairness. Philosophy of Justice, Springer: 311-328.
Føllesdal, A. (2015). "Machiavelli at 500: From Cynic to Vigilant Supporter of International Law." Ratio Juris 28(2): 242-251.
Føllesdal, A. (2014). "Competing Conceptions of Subsidiarity." Nomos 55: 214-230.
Føllesdal, A. (2014). Del av problemet, og del av løsningen: Den europeiske menneskerettighetsdomstolen og demokratisk selvstyre. Det norske demokratiet i det 21. århundre, Fagbokforlaget 80-91.
Føllesdal, A. (2014). Federalism and Human Rights in Nepal's Constitutional Design: Challenges for the Judiciary. Constitutionalism and Good Governance: Eastern and Western Perspectives, Nomos: 395.
Føllesdal, A. (2014). Global Citizenship. Global citizen - challenges and responsibility in an interconnected world, Sense Publishers: 128.
Føllesdal, A. (2014). Hvis det norske forbudet mot dobbelt norsk statsborgerskap er løsningen, hva er da problemet? Politisk kompetanse: Grunnlovas borgar 1814 - 2014, Pax Forlag: 416.
Føllesdal, A. (2014). Kant, Human Rights, and Courts. Kantian Theory and Human Rights, Routledge: 210.
Føllesdal, A. (2014). Much ado about nothing? International Judicial Review of Human Rights in Well Functioning Democracies. The Legitimacy of international human rights regimes: legal, political and philosophical perspectives, Cambridge University Press: 309.
Føllesdal, A. and K. Hessler (2021). "Gender imbalance on the international bench: is normative legitimacy at stake?" Journal of Social Philosophy 52(4): 430-435.
Føllesdal, A. and V. M. Muñiz Fraticelli (2015). "The principle of subsidiarity as a constitutional principle in the EU and Canada." Les ateliers de l'éthique 10(2): 89-106.
Gallant, K. (2022). International criminal jurisdiction: whose law must we obey?, Oxford University Press.
Gallant, K. (2018). "The Enforceability Deficit Concerning Victims’ Remedies." International Criminal Law Review: 1-22.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. (2020). "Let us Not Forget about the Role of Domestic Courts in Settling Investor-State Disputes." The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 18(3): 389-415.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. (2018). "It is Not Just About Investor-State Arbitration. A Look at Case C 284/16, Achmea BV’." European Papers (EP) 3(1): 357-373.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. (2018). "Quo Vadis EU investment law and policy? the shaky path towards the international promotion of EU rules." European Foreign Affairs Review 23(2): 167-186.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. (2016). Human Rights Conditionality in the EU's Newly Concluded Association Agreements with the Eastern Partners. Defending Human Rights and Democracy in the Era of Globalization, IGI Global: 300.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. (2016). "Joined cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: Converging human rights standards, mutual trust and a new ground for postponing a European arrest warrant." European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 24(2-3): 197-219.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. and L. Létourneau-Tremblay (2020). A Question of Impartiality: Who are the Dissenting Arbitrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration? Identity and Diversity on the International Bench: Who is the Judge?, Oxford University Press: 592.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. and M. Usynin (2018). "The Rising Trend of Including Investment Chapters into PTAs." Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 48: 267-304.
Giorgetti, C., et al. (2020). "Special Issue: Reforming International Investment Arbitration - An Introduction." The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 18(3): 303-313.
Gloppen, S. (2015). Studying Courts in Context: The Role of Nonjudicial Institutional and Socio-Political Realities. Closing the Rights Gap: From Human Rights to Social Transformation, University of California Press: 392.
Gloppen, S. (2014). Courts, corruption and judical independence. Corruption, grabbing and development: real world challenges, Edward Elgar Publishing: 216.
Grant Cohen, H., et al. (2018). Legitimacy and International Courts – A Framework. Legitimacy and International Courts, Cambridge University Press: 388.
Hermansen, S. S. L. (2020). "Building legitimacy: strategic case allocations in the Court of Justice of the European Union." Journal of European Public Policy 27(8): 1215-1235.
Hermansen, S. S. L. (2018). "(Self-)selection and expertise among decision-makers in the European Parliament." The Journal of Legislative Studies 24(1): 148-172.
Holmgren, M. (2018). "Partisan Politics and Institutional Choice in Public Bureaucracies: Evidence from Sweden." Journal of public administration research and theory 28(3): 355-370.
Huhe, N., et al. (2019). "Don’t cry for me Britannia: The resilience of the European Union to Brexit." European Union Politics.
Huhe, N., et al. (2017). "The Evolution of Political Networks: Evidence from the Council of the European Union." European Union Politics 19(1): 25-51.
James, N. (2016). Two Models of Normative Frameworks for Human Rights During Emergencies. Human Rights in Emergencies, Cambridge University Press: 302.
Johansen, S. Ø. (2023). An Assessment of IOM’s Human Rights Obligations and Accountability Mechanisms. IOM Unbound? Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion, Cambridge University Press: 101-136.
Karlsson Schaffer, J., et al. (2014). International human rights and the challenge of legitimacy. The Legitimacy of international human rights regimes: legal, political and philosophical perspectives, Cambridge University Press: 309.
Kessedjian, C., et al. (2022). "Mediation in Future Investor-State Dispute Settlement." Journal of International Dispute Settlement 14(2): 192-212.
Kirkebø, T. L. and M. Langford (2018). "The commitment curve: Global regulation of business and human rights." Business and Human Rights Journal 3(2): 157-185.
Kuyper, J. W. and T. Squatrito (2017). "International courts and global democratic values: Participation, accountability, and justification." Review of International Studies 43(1): 152-176.
Langford, M. (2015). "Rights, development and critical modernity." Development and Change 46(4): 777-802.
Langford, M. (2015). "Why Judicial Review?" Oslo Law Review 2(1): 36-85.
Langford, M., et al. (2020). Computational stylometry: predicting the authorship of investment treaty awards. Computational Legal Studies - The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Research, Edward Elgar Publishing: 384.
Langford, M. and D. F. Behn (2018). "Managing backlash: The evolving investment treaty arbitrator?" European journal of international law 29(2): 551-580.
Langford, M., et al. (2018). Backlash and State Strategies in International Investment Law. The Changing Practices of International Law, Cambridge University Press: 300.
Langford, M., et al. (2017). "The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration." Journal of International Economic Law 20(2): 301-332.
Langford, M. S., et al. (2022). The West and the Rest: Geographic Diversity and the Role of Arbitrator Nationality in Investment Arbitration. The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press: 283-314.
Langvatn, S. A. (2020). Taking Public Reason to Court: Understanding References to Public Reason in Discussions about Courts and Adjudication. Public Reason and Courts, Cambridge University Press: 368.
Langvatn, S. A. (2016). "Legitimate, but unjust; just, but illegitimate: Rawls on political legitimacy." Philosophy & Social Criticism 42(2): 132-153.
Langvatn, S. A. (2016). "Should International Courts Use Public Reason?" Ethics and International Affairs 30(3): 355-377.
Langvatn, S. A. and T. Squatrito (2017). Conceptualizing and Measuring the Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals. The Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals, Cambridge University Press: 41-65.
Larsson, O. and D. Naurin (2016). "Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU." International Organization 70(2): 377-408.
Larsson, O., et al. (2017). "Speaking Law to Power: The Strategic Use of Precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union." Comparative Political Studies 50(7): 879-907.
Létourneau-Tremblay, L. (2022). "In Need of a Paradigm Shift: Reimagining Eco Oro v Colombia in Light of New Treaty Language." Journal of World Investment & Trade 23(5-6): 915-946.
Lie, R. H. (2022). The Influence of Law Firms in Investment Arbitration. The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press.
Lie, R. H. (2022). "The Influencers of International Investment Law: A Computational Study of ISDS Actors' Changing Behavior." German Law Journal 23(3): 350-375.
Lundgren, M., et al. (2017). "Stability and change in international policy-making: A punctuated equilibrium approach." The Review of International Organizations: 1-26.
Madsen, M. R., et al. (2021). "Sovereignty, Substance, and Public Support for European Courts' Human Rights Rulings." American Political Science Review 116(2): 419-438.
Müller, A. S. (2017). Conclusion. Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights, Cambridge University Press: 504-528.
Müller, A. S. (2017). The ECtHR's Engagement with German and Russian Courts’ Decisions. Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights, Cambridge University Press: 287-338.
Müller, A. S. (2017). Obligations to ‘Secure’ the Rights of the Convention in an ‘Effective Political Democracy’: How Should Parliaments and Domestic Courts Interact? The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: 167-197.
Müller, A. S. (2016). "Domestic authorities’ obligations to co-develop the rights of the European convention on human rights." International Journal of Human Rights 20(8): 1058-1076.
Müller, A. S. (2015). "Oslo-Strasbourg-back to Oslo and/or into wider Europe? : the ECtHR's engagement with the decisions of Norwegian courts for strengthening the convention system as a cooperative system." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 33(1): 11-51.
Müller, A. S. and H. E. Kjos (2017). Introduction. Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights, Cambridge University Press: 1-24.
Naurin, N. D. (2018). "Liberal Intergovernmentalism in the Councils of the EU: A Baseline Theory?" Journal of Common Market Studies 56(7): 1526-1543.
Naurin, N. D. (2017). "The Puzzle of Transparency Reforms in the Council of the EU." Politics and Governance 5(3): 87-90.
Naurin, N. D., et al. (2017). "With or without you? Policy impact and networks in the Council of the EU after Brexit." European Policy Analysis.
Naurin, N. D. and D. Julian (2017). "Friends of the Court? Why EU governments file observations before the Court of Justice." European Journal of Political Research.
Naurin, N. D. and E. Naurin (2017). Descriptive Representation and Negotiation: Gender Balance in the Committees of the Council of the European Union. Gendering diplomacy and international negotiation, Palgrave Macmillan: 213-237.
Naurin, N. D., et al. (2019). "Gender stereotyping and chivalry in international negotiations. A survey experiment in the Council of the European Union." International Organization 73(2): 469-488.
Naurin, N. D. and C. Reh (2018). Deliberative Negotiation. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford University Press: 976.
Naurin, N. D. and Ø. Stiansen (2019). "The Dilemma of Dissent: Split Judicial Decisions and Compliance With Judgments From the International Human Rights Judiciary." Comparative Political Studies 53(6): 959-991.
Nicholson, J. (2019). "‘Too High’, ‘Too Low’, or ‘Just Fair Enough’?: Finding Legitimacy Through the Accused’s Right to a Fair Trial." Journal of International Criminal Justice 17(2): 351-368.
Nicholson, J. (2018). "The role played by external case law in promoting the legitimacy of international criminal court decisions." Nordic Journal of International Law 87(2): 189-211.
Nicholson, J. (2017). "Book Review: Justice in Conflict: The Effects of the International Criminal Court's Interventions on Ending Wars and Building Peace." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 35(1): 80-82.
Nicholson, J. (2017). Fighting and Victimhood in International Criminal Law, Routledge.
Nicholson, J. (2017). "Strengthening the Effectiveness of International Criminal Law through the Principle of Legality." International Criminal Law Review 17(4): 656-681.
Nicholson, J. (2016). "Is targeting naked child soldiers a war crime?" International Criminal Law Review 16: 134-157.
Nussberger, A. and F. Baetens (2020). Diversity on the Bench of the European Court of Human Rights: A Clash of Paradigms. Identity and Diversity on the International Bench: Who is the Judge?, Oxford University Press: 592.
Olof, L. and N. D. Naurin (2019). "Split Vision. Multidimensionality in the European Union’s Legal Policy Space." International Studies Quarterly.
Pavone, T. (2020). "Lawyers, judges, and the obstinate state: The French case and an agenda for comparative politics." French Politics 18(4): 416-432.
Pavone, T. (2020). "Putting European Constitutionalism in its Place: The Spatial Foundations of the EU’s Judicial Dialogue." European Constitutional Law Review 16(4): 669-690.
Pavone, T. and Ø. Stiansen (2021). "The Shadow Effect of Courts: Judicial Review and the Politics of Preemptive Reform." American Political Science Review 116(1): 322-336.
Penca, J. (2016). "The contribution of the UN to the development of international environmental law [Prispevek ozn k razvoju mednarodnega okoljskega prava]." Teorija in praksa 53(1): 103-117.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2023). "Sexual and Gender-Based Violence Committed by Non-State Armed Groups Against Women/Girls and lgbti + Persons in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Peru's Case." Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies 14: 377-416.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2022). "The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) vis-à-vis amnesties and pardons: factors concerning or affecting the degree of ECtHR’s deference to states." International Journal of Human Rights 26(6): 1107-1137.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2022). "UN-Backed Hybrid Criminal Tribunals (HCTS): Viable Options in International Criminal Justice?" International Criminal Law Review: 641-686.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2021). Judicial Protective Measures for Victims and Witnesses vis-à-vis External Actors at the International Criminal Court. The Past, Present and Future of the International Criminal Court, TOAEP - Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher: 487-523.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2021). "Much Cry and Little Wool?: Determining the Exact Role of the Inter-national Criminal Court in Transitional Justice Efforts." California Western International Law Journal 25(1): 381-434.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2021). "Victims at the Central African Republic's Special Criminal Court." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 39(1): 1-17.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2020). The Contribution of Female Judges to the Victim Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court. Identity and Diversity on the International Bench: Who is the Judge?, Oxford University Press: 592.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2020). "The control of the inter-American court of human rights over amnesty laws and other exemption measures: Legitimacy assessment." Leiden Journal of International Law 33(3): 667-687.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2020). The Extraordinary African Chambers in the Senegalese Courts and the Development of International Criminal Law in Africa. Africa’s Role and Contribution to International Criminal Justice, Intersentia: 284.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2020). Judicial Legal Culture and Victim Procedural Status at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon and Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Identity and Diversity on the International Bench: Who is the Judge?, Oxford University Press: 592.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2019). Anonymity for Victims at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Security and Human Rights at Work in International Criminal Justice. Security and Human Rights, Hart Publishing Ltd: 297-322.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2019). "Assessing Victim Participation during Sentencing at the International Criminal Court." Journal of International Criminal Justice 17(2): 431-451.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2019). Human Rights at the Reparations System of the International Criminal Court. Human Rights Norms in ‘Other' International Courts, Cambridge University Press: 163-198.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2019). Reparation Principles at the International Criminal Court. General Principles and the Coherence of International Law, Brill Nijhoff: 460.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2019). Reparations for Victims of Mass Atrocities: Actual and Potential Contributions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to the International Criminal Court. The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2018, Oxford University Press: 928.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2019). "Sentencing factors concerning those most responsible for international crimes in Peru: An analysis vis-a-vis international criminal court sources." International Criminal Law Review 19(1): 95-126.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2019). "Victims and Reparations in International Criminal Justice: African Initiatives." Nordic Journal of International Law 88(4): 525-557.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2018). "The Katanga reparation order at the International Criminal Court: Developing the emerging reparation practice of the Court." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 36(1): 91-102.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2017). "The close relationship between serious human rights violations and crimes against humanity: International criminalization of serious abuses." Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 17: 145-186.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2017). "International Criminal Justice Rendered Concerning the Attack Against Timbuktu Mausoleums and Mosque: Focus on Religion-related Considerations." Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (OJLR) 6(1): 180-186.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. (2017). "Victims at the Prospective International Criminal Law Section of the African Court of Justice and Human and Peoples' Rights." International Criminal Law Review 17(3): 453-485.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. and B. Elberling (2017). Article 55: Rights of persons during an investigation. Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court, TOAEP - Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher: 410-416.
Pérez León Acevedo, J. P. and B. Elberling (2017). Article 67: Rights of the Accused. Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court, TOAEP - Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher: 484-513.
Roberts, A. and T. St John (2023). "The Originality of Outsiders: Innovation in the Investment Treaty System." European journal of international law 33(4): 1153-1181.
Šadl, U., et al. (2022). "Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations." European Law Open 1(3): 549-575.
Saul, M. (2021). "Shaping Legislative Processes from Strasbourg." European journal of international law 32(1): 281-308.
Saul, M. W. (2017). Conclusion: How Does, Could and Should the International Human Rights Judiciary Interact with National Parliaments? The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: 353-387.
Saul, M. W. (2016). "Structuring evaluations of parliamentary processes by the European Court of Human Rights." International Journal of Human Rights 20(8): 1077-1096.
Saul, M. W. (2015). Conclusion: Towards a Fuller Understanding of the Foundations, Practice, and Future of the Role of International Law in Post-Conflict Reconstruction Policy. International Law and Post-Conflict Reconstruction Policy, Routledge: 354.
Saul, M. W. (2015). "The European Court of Human Rights' margin of appreciation and the processes of national parliaments." Human Rights Law Review 15(4): 745-774.
Saul, M. W. (2015). International Law and the Identification of an Interim Government to Lead Post-Conflict Reconstruction. International Law and Post-Conflict Reconstruction Policy, Routledge: 354.
Saul, M. W. (2014). "Identifying jus cogens norms: The interaction of scholars and international judges." Asian Journal of International Law 5(1): 26-54.
Saul, M. W., et al. (2017). Introduction. The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: 1-18.
Saul, M. W., et al. (2017). How and When Can the International Human Rights Judiciary Promote the Human Rights Role of National Parliaments? The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: 135-166.
Saul, M. W. and J. Sweeney (2015). Introduction. International Law and Post-Conflict Reconstruction Policy, Routledge: 354.
Scherz, A. (2023). "How Should Personal and Political Autonomy Feature in the ECtHR’s Margin of Appreciation?" Jus Cogens. A Critical Journal of Philosophy of Law and Politics.
Scherz, A. (2019). "Tying legitimacy to political power: Graded legitimacy standards for international institutions." European Journal of Political Theory: 1-23.
Scherz, A. and A. Zysset (2019). "The UN Security Council, Normative Legitimacy and the Challenge of Specificity." Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23(3): 371-391.
Squatrito, T. (2017). "Amicus Curiae Briefs in the WTO DSM: Good or Bad News for Non-State Actor Involvement?" World Trade Review 17(1): 65-89.
Squatrito, T. (2017). "Resourcing Global Justice: The Resource Management Design of International Courts." Global Policy 8: 62-74.
Squatrito, T. (2016). "Domestic Legislatures and International Human Rights Law: Legislating on religious symbols in Europe." Journal of Human Rights 15(4): 550-570.
Squatrito, T., et al. (2018). A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of International Courts and Tribunals. The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals, Cambridge University Press: 537.
St. John, T. (2018). The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences, Oxford University Press.
St. John, T. (2017). Investment: Contestation and Transformation. Beyond Gridlock, Polity Press: 83-101.
Stang, E. G. and O. K. Fauchald (2021). Norway: Norwegian Ombudsman for Children. Intergenerational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation. Advancing Future Generations Rights through National Institutions, Cambridge University Press: 352-373.
Stiansen, Ø. (2022). "(Non)renewable Terms and Judicial Independence in the European Court of Human Rights." Journal of Politics.
Stiansen, Ø. (2019). "Delayed but not derailed: legislative compliance with European Court of Human Rights judgments." International Journal of Human Rights.
Stiansen, Ø. (2019). "Directing Compliance? Remedial Approach and Compliance with European Court of Human Rights Judgments." British Journal of Political Science.
Stiansen, Ø., et al. (2020). "Law and Politics in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. A New Database on Judicial Behavior and Compliance in the IACtHR." Journal of Law and Courts 8(2): 359-379.
Stiansen, Ø. and E. Voeten (2020). "Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights." International Studies Quarterly 64(4): 770-784.
Strain, N. C. (2023). Methodological Consistency in the Interpretation of International Treaties in Investor-State Arbitration - An Empirical Study. Applicable Law Issues in International Arbitration, Brill|Nijhoff: 600.
Strain, N. C. (2022). "Invoking Systemic Ideals or Systemic Rules? Jurisdiction in WTO and Investor-State Dispute Settlement." Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht 82(2): 401-424.
Strømmen, E. E. J. (2018). Kjønn og Fremmedkrigere: ‘Jihadbruder’ og kvinnelig agens i IS. Fremmedkrigere: forebygging, straffeforfølgning og rehabilitering i Skandinavia, Gyldendal Akademisk: 440.
Sælen, H., et al. (2019). "Fairness conceptions and self-determined mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: Is there a relationship?" Environmental Science and Policy 101: 245-254.
Tallberg, J., et al. (2016). "Democratic memberships in international organizations: Sources of institutional design." The Review of International Organizations 11(1): 59-87.
Tallberg, J., et al. (2014). "Explaining the transnational design of international organizations." International Organization 68(4): 741-774.
Tallberg, J., et al. (2016). "The performance of international organizations: a policy output approach." Journal of European Public Policy 23(7): 1077-1096.
Tsereteli, N. (2016). "Emerging doctrine of deference of the inter-American court of human rights?" International Journal of Human Rights 20(8): 1097-1112.
Tørstad, V. (2020). "Participation, ambition and compliance: can the Paris Agreement solve the effectiveness trilemma?" Environmental Politics 29(5): 761-780.
Tørstad, V., et al. (2020). "The domestic politics of international climate commitments: which factors explain cross-country variation in NDC ambition?" Environmental Research Letters 15(2): 10.
Ulfstein, G. (2023). "Farewell to Compulsory Jurisdiction." British Year Book of International Law: 1-9.
Ulfstein, G. (2023). Internasjonale menneskerettigheter: Hvem skal ha det siste ordet? Hellums metode. Festskrift til Anne Hellum 70 år, Gyldendal Akademisk: 396.
Ulfstein, G. (2022). "Qatar v. United Arab Emirates." American Journal of International Law 116(2): 397-403.
Ulfstein, G. (2021). "The Svalbard Treaty and research: Comment to Pedersen and Molenaar." The Polar Journal A-head-of-print.
Ulfstein, G. (2021). "Transnational constitutional aspects of the European Court of Human Rights." Global Constitutionalism 10(1): 151-174.
Ulfstein, G. (2021). United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Universality and National Implementation. The Achievements of International Law: essays in honour of Robin Churchill, Hart Publishing Ltd: 123-144.
Ulfstein, G. (2019). How should the European Court of Human Rights respond to Criticism? The International Rule of Law? Rise or Decline?, Oxford University Press: 400.
Ulfstein, G. (2019). "Interpretation of the ECHR in light of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties." International Journal of Human Rights 24(7): 1-18.
Ulfstein, G. (2018). Evolutive Interpretation in the Light of Other International Instruments: Law and Legitimacy. The European Convention on Human Rights and General International Law, Oxford University Press: 352.
Ulfstein, G. (2018). The Human Rights Treaty Bodies and Legitimacy Challenges. Legitimacy and International Courts, Cambridge University Press: 388.
Ulfstein, G. (2018). International Courts and Tribunals and the Rule of Law in Asia. Global Constitutionalism from European and East Asian Perspectives, Cambridge University Press: 608.
Ulfstein, G. (2018). "The role of outcasting in the world order." Global Constitutionalism 7(3): 368-373.
Ulfstein, G. (2017). Den europeiske menneskerettighetsdomstolen og Høyesteretts juridiske metode. Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati, Universitetsforlaget: 238-254.
Ulfstein, G. (2017). A Transitional Separation of Powers? The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: 21-31.
Ulfstein, G. (2016). The European Court of Human Rights and national courts: a constitutional relationship? Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights protection., Routledge: 205.
Ulfstein, G. (2016). "Høyesteretts anvendelse av traktatorganers tolkningspraksis." Lov og Rett 55(7): 395-404.
Ulfstein, G. (2014). Law-making by Human Rights Treaty Bodies. International Law-making. Essays in Honour of Jan Klabbers, Routledge: 249-257.
Ulfstein, G. (2014). Towards an International Human Rights Judiciary. International Law and Changing Perceptions of Security, Brill|Nijhoff: 350.
Ulfstein, G. (2013). "'Awarding Compensation in a Fragmented Legal System: The Diallo Case'." Journal of International Dispute Settlement 4(3): 477-485.
Ulfstein, G. and M. Aksenova (2016). The Task of Regional and International Courts in Guarding Constitutionalism and Human Rights. Judges as Guardians of Constitutionalism and Human Rights, Edward Elgar Publishing: 400.
Ulfstein, G., et al. (2022). Editors’ Introduction: State Immunity and the Need for a Global Discussion. Sovereign Immunity Under Pressure - Norms, Values and Interests, Springer: 1-9.
Ulfstein, G. and R. Churchill (2020). The Application of the Svalbard Treaty Offshore. Svalbardtraktaten 100 år - et jubileumsskrift, Fagbokforlaget: 300.
Ulfstein, G. and A. Føllesdal (2014). The European Court of Human Rights and the Norwegian Supreme Court: Independence and Democratic Control. The independence of judges, Eleven International Publishing: 344.
Ulfstein, G., et al. (2020). "The European Convention on Human Rights and other parts of international law." International Journal of Human Rights 24(7): 913-916.
Ulfstein, G. and A. Zimmermann (2018). "Certiorari through the Back Door? The Judgment by the European Court of Human Rights in Burmych and Others v. Ukraine in Perspective." The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 17(2): 289-308.
Voigt, C. (2022). "The climate change dimension of human rights: due diligence and states’ positive obligations." Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 13: 152-171.
Voigt, C. (2022). "The Climate Dimension of Human Rights Obligations: Due Diligence and States´ Positive Obligations." Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 13(Special edition): 152-171.
Voigt, C. (2021). "The first climate judgment before the Norwegian Supreme Court: Aligning law with politics." Journal of Environmental Law 33(3): 697-710.
voigt, C. (2021). International Responsibility and Liability. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University Press.
Voigt, C. (2021). State responsibility for damages associated with climate change. Research Handbook on Climate Change Law and Loss & Damage, Edward Elgar Publishing: 166-184.
Voigt, C. (2019). Climate Change at the Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in Cases related to Climate Change. The Promise of Law: Essays marking the retirement of Dame Sian Elias as Chief Justice of New Zealand, LexisNexis Butterworths: 500.
Voigt, C. (2019). The Environment and Peace: What Role for International Law? Research Handbook on International Law and Peace, Edward Elgar Publishing: 543.
Voigt, C. (2019). "How could a “Global Pact for the Environment” add value to International Environmental Law?" Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 28: 13-24.
Voigt, C. (2019). Introduction: International Courts and the Environment: Questions of Legitimacy? International Judicial Practice on the Environment – Questions of Legitimacy, Cambridge University Press: 475.
Voigt, C. (2015). Environmentally Sustainable Development and Peace: What Role of International Law? Promoting Peace Through International Law, Oxford University Press.
Voigt, C. and F. Ferreira (2016). "'Dynamic Differentiation': The Principles of CBDR-RC, Progression and Highest Possible Ambition in the Paris Agreement." Transnational Environmental Law 5(2): 285-303.
Voigt, C. and F. Ferreira (2015). "The Legal Aspects of REDD+ Implementation: Translating the International Rules into Effective National Frameworks ∙ The Warsaw Framework for REDD+: Implications for National Implementation and Access to Results-based Finance." Carbon and Climate Law Review 9(2): 113-129.
Voigt, C. and E. Grant (2015). "The Legitimacy of Human Rights Courts in Environmental Disputes - Editorial." Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 6(2): 131-138.
Voigt, C. and G. Ulfstein (2014). Rethinking the legal form and principles of a new climate agreement. Toward a New Climate Agreement. Conflict, Resolution and Governance, Routledge: 328.
Voigt, C. (2015). Art. 11 TFEU in the Light of the Principle of Sustainable Development in International Law. The Greening of European Business under EU Law, Routledge.
Wibye, J. V. (2022). "Beyond Acts and Omissions — Distinguishing Positive and Negative Duties at the European Court of Human Rights." Human Rights Review 23(4): 479-502.
Wibye, J. V. (2022). "Liberty to Request Exemption as Right to Conscientious Objection." The New Bioethics 28(4): 327-340.
Wibye, J. V. (2022). "Reviving the Distinction between Positive and Negative Human Rights." Ratio Juris 35(4): 363-382.
Wibye, J. V. (2021). "En rett for enhver plikt – om korrelasjonstesen og dens påståtte unntak." Retfærd. Nordisk Juridisk Tidsskrift 169(2): 9-29.
Wibye, J. V. and A. P. Høgberg (2021). "Klimadommens forsvinningsnummer – når borgere blir tredjeparter til konstitusjonelle rettighetsbestemmelser." Retfærd. Nordisk Juridisk Tidsskrift(2): 61-74.
Young, O. R., et al. (2018). What We Know So Far. The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals, Cambridge University Press: 537.
Zang, M. Q. (2017). "Shall We Talk? Judicial Communication between the CJEU and WTO Dispute Settlement." European journal of international law 28(1): 273-293.
Zang, M. Q. (2015). "The Uncompleted Mission of China — Electronic Payment Services: Policy Equilibrium between Market Access and National Treatment under the GATS." Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 12(1): 16-32.
Zihua, G., et al. (2019). "Facilitating implementation and promoting compliance with the Paris agreement under article 15: Conceptual challenges and pragmatic choices." Climate Law 9(1-2): 65-100.
Zysset, A. (2017). "Book review: The Heart of Human Rights, written by Allen Buchanan." Nordic Journal of Human Rights 86(2): 267-273.
Zysset, A. (2017). "Right, Crime, and Court: Toward a Unifying Political Conception of International Law." Criminal Law and Philosophy: 1-17.
Zysset, A. F. (2022). "Calibrating the response to populism at the European Court of Human Rights." International Journal of Constitutional Law 20(3): 976-1005.
Zysset, A. F. (2022). "International crimes through the lens of global constitutionalism." Global Constitutionalism 12(1): 59-79.
Zysset, A. F. (2022). "To Derogate or to Restrict? The COVID‑19 Pandemic, Proportionality and the Justifcatory Gap in European Human Rights Law." Jus Cogens. A Critical Journal of Philosophy of Law and Politics 4: 285-301.
Zysset, A. F. and A. Scherz (2021). "Proportionality as procedure: Strengthening the legitimate authority of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights." Global Constitutionalism 10(3): 524-546.
Selected forthcoming publications per December 2023:
Baetens, F. (expected 2025). Book on oversight mechanisms in international dispute resolution. Cambridge University Press.
Føllesdal, A. (2024). Subsidiarity. Cambridge University Press.
Langford, M. and Gloppen, S. (2024). International Lawfare and Sexual and Reproductive Rights. Cambridge University Press.
Strain, N. (2024). The Adjudicator’s Toolkit and the Force of International Law: Comparing Trade and Investment Disputes. Brill Nijhoff
Ulfstein, G. (2024). Deference by International Courts and Tribunals. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law.
Ulfstein, G. (2024). Advanced Introduction to International Courts and Tribunals. Elgar Advanced Introductions Series.
Usynin, M., Létourneau-Tremblay, L. and Fauchald, O. K. (2025). Investment Law and Environmental Crises. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Voigt, C. and Foster, C. (2024). International Courts versus Non-Compliance Mechanisms - Comparative advantages in strengthening treaty implementation. Cambridge University Press.
Zysset, A. (2024). Saving and Strengthening ‘Democratic Society’: The European Court of Human Rights in Times of Populism. Cambridge University Press.