There is a remarkable difference between that which Anglo-American legal philosophers more or less unanimously regard as their subject matter (namely, law and the related notions of morality, authority, coercion, etc.) and that which prominent Continental writers have emphasized as one of the main topics for jurisprudential discussion.
The latter have often directed their attention to something quite specific: not law or the aforementioned law-related phenomena, but the study of law, or legal scholarship. In particular, Continental writers have been interested in legal scholarship as it is characteristically produced by law teachers.
Some phrases that may be used to describe this type of scholarship are
- “doctrinal legal scholarship”
- “legal dogmatics”, and
- “legal science in a narrow a sense”.
This paper explains why Anglo-American theorists should keep their minds open to the idea that jurisprudence may take the doctrinal study of law as its subject matter. It also attempts to explain what doctrinal legal scholarship is, and thus engages in precisely the type of jurisprudential inquiry that it is out to promote.