Monday 7 April 2014
|
08:30-09:00 |
Registration |
|
|
09:00-09:30 |
Opening ceremony Anders Anundsen, Minister of Justice, Norway Philippe Boillat, Director General, Council of Europe Dean Spielmann, President of the European Court of Human Rights Andreas Føllesdal, Professor, Director of PluriCourts, University of Oslo |
|
|
Session I – History, reforms and remaining challenges Chair: Morten Ruud, Norwegian Ministry of Justice, Chairperson of DH-GDR |
||
|
09:30-10:40 |
The ECtHR: Historical framework Morten Ruud, Norwegian Ministry of Justice, Chairperson of DH-GDR
The Interlaken/Izmir/Brighton process – outside and inside evaluations Başak Çalı, Professor, Koc University Law School Martin Kuijer, Senior legal adviser on human rights law, Ministry of Security and Justice, Netherlands
The success and challenges for the European Court, seen from the outside Laurence Helfer, Professor, Duke University
The success and challenges for the European Court, seen from the inside Dean Spielmann, President of the European Court of Human Rights
Invited reflections on the above, as an intro to the general debate Vit Schorm, Government Agent, Ministry of Justice, Czech Republic; Chairperson of CDDH |
|
|
10:40-11:10 |
Coffee/tea |
|
|
11:10-12:30 |
General debate |
|
|
12:30-14:00 |
Lunch |
|
|
Session II- The Court in the year 2030 Chair: Morten Ruud, Norwegian Ministry of Justice, Chairperson of DH-GDR |
||
|
14:00-16:30 |
Subsidiarity: Dialogue between ECtHR and national Courts How do ECtHR and national courts interact in the interpretation and development of the ECHR? Do ECtHR judgments have erga omnes effect; and if yes, to what extent? What is the role of margin of appreciation and European consensus? Andreas Paulus, Judge, Federal Constitutional Court, Germany
Comments Kristīne Līce, Government Agent, Representative of the Government of Latvia before International Human Rights Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Latvia Julia Laffranque, Judge, European Court of Human Rights
Accountability and authority The ECtHR must be independent, yet accountable. How does the Court interact with domestic and European democratic bodies? How should the authority of its judgments best be maintained? Does it respect professional standards of legal reasoning? Should it be more responsive to public opinion? Is there room for principled non-compliance? Andreas Føllesdal, Professor, Director of PluriCourts, University of Oslo
Comments Almut Wittling-Vogel, Representative of the Federal Government for Matters relating to Human Rights, Federal Ministry of Justice, Germany Alan Miller, Chair, European Network of National Human Rights Institutions
Rule of law: “Constitutional Court” or “guardian of individuals” The system established in 1950 was based on a Commission who handled all individual applications, and a Court who was only seized in cases submitted by either the Commission or the responding State. By Protocol 11 the Court and Commission were merged. Today, the Court sifts all applications and decides on admissible cases. Serious cases can be submitted to a Grand Chamber. Has this reform functioned as expected, and does it permit the Court to fulfill both tasks reasonably well? –If not, how might it improve? Luzius Wildhaber, Professor, University of Basel; former President of the ECtHR Geir Ulfstein, Professor, Co-director of PluriCourts, University of Oslo
Comments Frank Schürmann, Government Agent, Federal Office of Justice, Switzerland Adam Bodnar, Vice-President, Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, Poland |
|
|
16:30-17:00 |
Coffee/tea |
|
|
17:00-18:00 |
General debate |
|
|
18:00 |
Closing of session |
|
|
19:15 |
Apéritif Nobel Room, Holmenkollen Park Hotel |
|
|
19:45 |
Dinner The Gallery, Holmenkollen Park Hotel |
|
Tuesday 8 April 2014
|
Session III – Implementation of judgments Chair: Morten Ruud, Norwegian Ministry of Justice, Chairperson of DH-GDR |
|
|
09:00-10:30 |
A main challenge for the credibility of the system in the years to come will be the implementation of judgments by the member states.
Roles of the Court Which steps can or should the Court take to speed up domestic implementation? Are the remedies at the Court’s disposal appropriate to this end, including pilot judgments? How should the Court deal with repetitive cases? Dinah Shelton, Professor, George Washington University Law School
Comments Rob Linham, Head of Council of Europe Human Rights Policy, Ministry of Justice, United Kingdom Helen Keller, Judge, European Court of Human Rights
Role of the Committee of Ministers The responsibility to ensure the proper implementation of judgments lies with the Committee of Ministers. The CM has a growing number of cases on its agenda, and implementation often takes considerable time. Should the CM process be made more efficient, and does the Committee have adequate resources and sanctions? Elisabeth Lambert-Abdelgawad, Professor, University of Strasbourg
Comments Carl-Henrik Ehrenkrona, Permanent Representative of Sweden to the Council of Europe Christos Giakoumopoulos, Director of Human Rights, Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law of the Council of Europe
Role of National Parliaments The responsibility to respect and implement the judgments of the Court lies with the governments. It differs considerable if and to what extent national parliaments are involved, i.a. to supervise implementation. What can be done by the parliaments, and by other national institutions or bodies to encourage and facilitate swifter implementation? Alice Donald, Senior Research Fellow, Middlesex University
Comments Liselot Egmond, Deputy Agent for the Government of the Netherlands, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Netherlands |
|
10:30-10:50 |
Coffee/tea |
|
10:50-12:00 |
General debate |
|
12:00-12:30 |
Closing the conference – summing up Chair: Morten Ruud, Norwegian Ministry of Justice, Chairperson of DH-GDR
Geir Ulfstein, Professor, Co-director of PluriCourts, University of Oslo Philippe Boillat, Director General, Council of Europe
|
| 13:00 | Lunch |