Andreas Follesdal and Marlene Wind
Introduction – Nordic Scepticism toward Judicial Review
Current National Practices in the Nordic Countries
Joakim Nergelius
Judicial Review in Swedish Law – A Critical Analysis
Inger-Johanne Sand
Judicial Review in Norway under Recent Conditions of European Law and International Human Rights Law – A Comment
Sten Schaumburg-Müller
Parliamentary Precedence in Denmark – a Jurisprudential Assessment
Ragnhildur Helgadottir
Status Presens – Judicial Review in Iceland
Toumas Ojane
From Constitutional Periphery toward the Center – Transformations of Judicial Review in Finland
Explanatory strategies and normative assessments of hesitant judicial review in Nordic Countries
Palle Svensson
Conceptions of Democracy and Judicial Review
Uffe Jakobsen
Conceptions of “Nordic Democracy” and European Integration
Mats Lundstrøm
Value Relativism, Procedural Democracy and Opinion Representation – Reflections on Three Conceptual Underpinnings of Swedish Anti-Constitutionalism
Hege Skjeie
Policy Views on the Incorporation of Human Rights Conventions –The Doctrine of “Appropriate Restrictionism” in Norway
Marlene Wind
When Parliament Comes First – The Danish Concept of Democracy Meets the European Union
Andreas Follesdal
Why the European Court on Human Rights might be Democratically Legitimate – A Modest Defense