edum

Kan ikke hente personopplysninger fra ekstern kilde

Pressebilde

Bakgrunn

Eduardo Sánchez Madrigal er vitenskapeligassistent ved Norsk senter for menneskerettigheter. Han jobber primært med redaksjonskontoret for Nordic Journal of Human Rights og forskningsgruppen ‘Menneskerettigheter, væpnede konflikter og loven om fred og sikkerhet’. Han har også bidratt til å organisere flere seminarer og arrangementer, inkludert blant annet den elektroniske paneldiskusjonen ‘Norwegian and International Support to Human Rights Defenders - Under and After COVID-19’ (i samarbeid med Det norske menneskerettighetsfond) og GOODPOL Public Lecture Series (i samarbeid med Senter for grunnforskning ved Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi).

Som student på masterstudiet i Theory and Practice of Human Rights (2019-2021) var han en del av det første teamet som representerte Universitetet i Oslo ved Nelson Mandela World Human Rights Moot Court Competition. Masteroppgaven hans fokuserte på ansvaret for å beskytte religiøse minoriteter mot masse grusomheter og ble tildelt Fritt Ord studentstipend for sin kvalitet og relevans.

Han har tidligere jobbet i advokatfirmaer og som lærerassistent i Mexico. Fra 2016-2020 var han viseleder for Year-in-Review, en årlig publikasjon av American Bar Association. Han har også hatt frivillige stillinger i ressurssentre for innvandrere og internasjonale fora, både i Norge og i utlandet.

Utdanning

M.Phil. Theory and Practice of Human Rights, Universitetet i Oslo (2019-2021)
LL.M. i amerikansk rett, University of St. Thomas School of Law (2016-2017)
LL.B., Universidad Panamericana (Studiested Guadalajara) (2011-2016)

Faglige interesser

Tros-og livssynsfrihet
Ansvar for å beskytte (R2P)
Internasjonal offentlig rett
Retten til fred

Emneord: Menneskerettigheter, Publisering, Nordic Journal of Human Rights

Zyberi, Gentian & Sánchez Madrigal, Eduardo (2022). The practice of judicial and quasi-judicial human rights bodies on conscientious objection to military service. I Wiener, Michael & Fernández Puyana, David (Red.), A Missing Piece for Peace: Bringing Together the Right to Peace and Freedom of Conscientious Objection to Military Service. UPEACE Press. ISSN 978-9930-542-43-9. s. 121–139. Vis sammendrag
This chapter analyses the issue of conscientious objection to military service as developed by the UN Human Rights Committee (HRCttee or Committee) and the main regional human rights mechanisms, with a focus on relevant case law and other practice.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

Zyberi, Gentian & Sánchez Madrigal, Eduardo (2022). 'The Function and Legal Status of Interim Measures Indicated by Various Human Rights Bodies and the International Court of Justice'. Vis sammendrag
The analysis includes the practice of UN human rights treaty bodies, with a focus on the practice of the UN Human Rights Committee, and the regional human rights mechanisms. The paper opens with a look at the practice of the UN Human Rights Committee. After this, it turns to the practice of other UN human rights treaty bodies and the regional human rights mechanisms. The practice of the International Court of Justice is also discussed. Most human rights mechanisms have concluded that their interim or provisional measures are legally binding, although there are still some lingering controversies concerning their legal nature and potential consequences in instances of non-compliance by States.
Zyberi, Gentian & Sánchez Madrigal, Eduardo (2021). The Legal Nature of Interim Measures Adopted by Human Rights Mechanisms. Vis sammendrag
This research project analyses the position adopted by various human rights bodies concerning the legal nature of interim or provisional measures (the terms are used interchangeably), outlining first their legal basis and then the position taken by these mechanisms in their practice. The analysis includes the practice of United Nations’ human rights treaty bodies, with a focus on the practice of the United Nations Human Rights Committee, and the regional human rights mechanisms. First, the paper looks at the practice of the Human Rights Committee in the context of the implementation of the First Optional Protocol, before turning to the practice of the other UN treaty bodies. Then, the practice of the three regional human rights mechanisms (based on a one-tier or two-tier system) is presented. Finally, the paper includes also the practice of the International Court of Justice, given the court’s importance as the principal judicial organ of the UN, and its practice in consular and diplomatic protection cases. While most of these judicial and quasi-judicial bodies have concluded that their interim measures are legally binding, there are still some lingering controversies concerning their legal nature and potential consequences for non-compliance.